CAROL A. BUONANNO N/K/A CAROL A. MURILLO, PETITIONER,
v.
STEPHEN P. BUONANNO, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2010-04-23
No. 5D10-376
PALMER, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
33 So. 3d 782 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus denied. See Fla. Pharmacy Ass’n, Inc. v. Strong, 604 So.2d 529 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (where private individual seeks mandamus to compel public official to perform duty, individual must first make express and distinct demand on public official to perform duty before remedy of mandamus will be considered).

PETITION DENIED.

PALMER, EVANDER and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (19 total)

  • Addie v. Onyx Coale, 120 So. 3d 44 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
    …e the denial of the husband’s request for alimony. We decline to disturb the trial court’s denial of the husband’s request for fees and costs. Child Support Child support awards must be supported by competent substantial evidence. Hindle v. Fuith, 33 So. 3d 782, 786 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). In making an award of child support under section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2011), the trial court is required to determine the net income of each parent and to include adequate findings in the final judgment. Id. Here, the…
  • Duke v. Duke, 211 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
    …here is no transcript or proper substitute in the record. Klette v. Klette, 785 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). However, if the trial court’s error is clear on the face of the order or judgment, the appellate court can reverse. Hindle v. Fuith, 33 So. 3d 782, 785 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); see Ferguson v. Ferguson, 54 So. 3d 553, 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding former wife’s failure to include transcript of hearing did not preclude appellate review of order where reversible error existed on [*1081] face of or…
  • Holub v. Ursula E. Holub, 54 So. 3d 585 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …ived with him in another state for six consecutive months prior to the initial filing. This record supports the trial court’s exercise of jurisdiction pursuant to sections 61.514(l)(a), 61.514(l)(b), and 61.503(7), Florida Statutes. Hindle v. Fuith, 33 So. 3d 782 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (child resided in several states during six months prior to commencement of the action, no court of any other state would have had jurisdiction as home state; Florida trial court had jurisdiction to make initial custody determina…

Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw