THE UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI, APPELLANT,
v.
DANIEL ANSCHER, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2010-03-10
No. 3D09-2654
Before GERSTEN and SHEPHERD, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
34 So. 3d 50 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2010)
Topics
Temporary Injunction Requirements Adequacy Of Legal Remedy Balance Of Harms Likelihood Of Success On The Merits

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Temporary Injunction Requirements cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
GERSTEN, J.

GERSTEN, J.

The University of Miami (“UM”) appeals an order granting a temporary injunction in favor of Daniel Anscher (“the student”). We reverse.

There are four well-established requirements for issuing a temporary injunction: (1) the likelihood of irreparable harm and the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (2) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (3) that the threatened injury to the petitioner outweighs any possible harm to the respondent; and (4) the entry of the injunction will not disserve the public interest. See LaRose v. A.K., 32 So.3d 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

Here, because the student did not adequately establish the elements for a temporary injunction, the trial judge improperly granted the temporary injunction. Accordingly, we reverse the temporary injunction.

Reversed and remanded.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw