LAWRENCE V. HASTINGS, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUISE Z. OSIUS, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Conflict Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw
Petition for certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, is granted. 97 So.2d 623.
The cause is hereby ordered placed on the oral argument calendar to be heard in due course. No further record or briefs arc required.
Argument shall be limited to the question of whether the decision of the District Court is in direct conflict with the decision of this Court in Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 800, and similar -cases holding that certiorari will not issue to review an order or judgment which may be brought to the appellate court for review on a direct appeal.
TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
Lawrence v. Hastings, 104 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1958)…lict with the decision of this Court in Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla.1954, 72 So. 2d 800, and similar cases holding that certiorari would not lie to review an order or judgment which was reviewable on direct appeal. We granted certiorari on March 5, 1958, 101 So. 2d 37, and limited the argument to the sole question of whether or not these decisions are in conflict. Cf. Ansin v. Thurston, Fla.1958, 101 So. 2d 808, 811. We are not here concerned with nor are we authorized under the Constitution, as amended, to pass…
-
Roach v. CSX Transp., Inc., 598 So. 2d 246 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…ral law determines questions as to the nature and sufficiency of evidence, proof necessary for judgment, and burden of proof. Brady v. Southern Railway Co., 320 U.S. 476, 64 S.Ct. 232, 88 L.Ed. 239 (1943); Atlantic Coast Line Railway Co. v. Barrett, 101 So. 2d 37 (Fla.1958); Overstreet v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co., 152 So. 2d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). When motions for directed verdicts are made in these cases, the judge must grant the motion only if, viewing the evidence in its entirety and drawing all…
-
Conner v. Butler, 109 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)…by the Su [*184] preme Court of the United States in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 77 S.Ct. 443, 1 L.Ed.2d 493, as recognized and quoted by the Supreme Court of Florida in Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Barrett, Fla.1958, 101 So. 2d 37. The Rogers case lays down a rule as to the quantum of proof relating to the employer's negligence in F.E.L.A. cases which requires submission of the claim to a jury for its determination. According to the Rogers decision, to borrow the language of…
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Slatcoff v. Dezen, 72 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 1954)
- Servet Zeko v. Gertrude Gleason, 97 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957)
- Osius v. Hastings, 97 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957)