RANDY MCPHERSON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CASEY LANDES, APPELLANT,
v.
GROUND ZERO AND PAYCHEX BUSINESS SOLUTION AND AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, INC., SRS CLAIMS SERVICES, APPELLEES
RANDY MCPHERSON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CASEY LANDES, APPELLANT,
GROUND ZERO AND PAYCHEX BUSINESS SOLUTION AND AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, INC., SRS CLAIMS SERVICES, APPELLEES
34 So. 3d 195
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Upon review of Appellant’s response to this court’s March 2, 2010, order to show cause, we conclude the order being appealed is a non-appealable, non-final order. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.180(b)(1). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
KAHN, DAVIS, and THOMAS, JJ, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thorne v. State, 174 So. 3d 477 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…s during their deliberations.”). Following Young, appellate courts have held that a trial court’s decision to allow the jury to have access to the defendant’s videotaped confession in the jury room is not an abuse of discretion. See Lucas v. State, 34 So. 3d 195, 196 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Thomas v. State, 878 So. 2d 458, 459 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Thus, the trial court properly acted within its discretion when it permitted the jury, during deliberations, to take to the jury room a laptop containing appellant’s…