EDWARD FRANCIS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2010-05-19
No. 4D09-3708
FARMER, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
35 So. 3d 122 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

FARMER, HAZOURI and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • L.S. v. State, 120 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
    …ns. GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ., concur. . Our research has shown that in cases applying the section 812.022(2) presumption, the time between the theft and the defendant’s possession of the stolen item is typically very short. See e.g. Morales v. State, 35 So. 3d 122, 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (three weeks); Wilkins v. State, 18 So. 3d 8 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (fewer than twenty-four hours); Kerr v. State, 954 So. 2d 692, 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (one day); Bronson v. State, 926 So. 2d 480, 482 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (a fe…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw