LARRY BANTOLA, APPELLANT,
v.
SANDRA BANTOLA, N/K/A SANDRA SIMIC, APPELLEE
LARRY BANTOLA, APPELLANT,
SANDRA BANTOLA, N/K/A SANDRA SIMIC, APPELLEE
35 So. 3d 145
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Larry Bantola, the father, appeals from an order eliminating a bond to ensure return of his child from a visit with Sandra Bantola, n/k/a Sandra Simic, the mother in Peru. Finding no abuse of discretion, we *146affirm the trial court order. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
B.G. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families & Guardian Ad Litem Program, 189 So. 3d 305 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…Relinquishing Jurisdiction is vacated. This opinion does not compel the removal of the Child from her Father’s residence in Texas. Rather, the trial court must hold a hearing on remand to ensure -the Child is [*308] in a safe placement. In re J.D., 35 So. 3d 145 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). If the trial court finds it is in the Child’s best interest to be placed with the Father pending disposition, the Department must comply with the ICPC. In that case, the trial court must determine if it is in the Child’s best int…
-
R.F. v. Dep't OF Child. & Families Ad Litem Program & C.K., 50 So. 3d 1243 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…ICPC process if it is in the child’s best interest. [*1245] See H.P. v. Dept. of Children and Families, 838 So. 2d 583, 586-87 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); see also Dept. of Children and Families v. T.T., 42 So. 3d 962, 964 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010); In re J.D., 35 So. 3d 145 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). DCF and the Guardian Ad Litem Program argue that there are no exceptions to the ICPC procedures, and strict compliance with the compact is required. They argue if the procedures were not complied with and the receiving state was…
Authorities Cited
- Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)