VINCENT ANTHONY MICHAEL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2010-06-02
No. 2D09-998
SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
35 So. 3d 1023 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2010) Positive Treatment

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Vincent Anthony Michael appeals his judgments and sentences for possession of cocaine, possession of marijuana, and possession of drug paraphernalia. He challenges the trial court’s finding that he was competent to proceed to trial. We affirm Michael’s judgments and sentences without comment. However, because the trial court did not enter a written order on its oral finding of competency, we remand this case solely for entry of a written order finding Michael competent to proceed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.212(b); Hampton v. State, 4 So.3d 789, 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).

Affirmed and remanded.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw