RONNIE ANTWAN RICKS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-05-26
No. 1D09-5954
HAWKES, C.J., BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
36 So. 3d 810 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a sentence exceeding the statutory maximum for the offense is illegal and requires resentencing.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant received a 40-year sentence for attempted robbery with a firearm, which is a second-degree felony punishable by up to 15 years. The lowest p…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has filed a rule 3.800(a) motion asserting that his 40-year sentence for attempted robbery with a firearm is illegal. Because it appears that the appellant’s sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the appellant is entitled to be resen-tenced.

Attempted armed robbery is a second-degree felony punishable by up to 15 years’ imprisonment. §§ 812.13(2)(a), 777.04(4)(e), 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2006); Washington v. State, 11 So.3d 998 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). If the lowest permissible sentence on the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet exceeds the statutory maximum sentence, the sentence required by the Code must be imposed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(25); § 921.0024(2), Fla. Stat. (2006); Butler v. State, 838 So.2d 554, 555-56 (Fla.2003). In the instant case, the appellant’s lowest permissible sentence on the scoresheet was 16.375 years’ imprisonment, and the 40-year sentence imposed clearly exceeds both the 15-year statutory maximum and the lowest permissible sentence.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing. We affirm without further discussion the appellant’s remaining claims.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

HAWKES, C.J., BENTON and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Antoine Smith v. State, 93 So. 3d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
    …’s criminal punishment code scoresheet is 337.8 months, or 28.15 years’ imprisonment. When the lowest permissible sentence on a scoresheet exceeds the statutory maximum, it is the lowest permissible sentence that must be imposed. See Ricks v. State, 36 So. 3d 810 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). The 30-year sentence thus exceeds both the statutory maximum sentence and the lowest permissible sentence on his scoresheet and therefore constitutes an illegal sentence. Although it appears from the record that the appellant ag…
  • G.M.R. v. Dept. of Children and Families, 262 So. 3d 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw