AMADA LAMA, APPELLANT,
v.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE
AMADA LAMA, APPELLANT,
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE
36 So. 3d 920
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases
Opinion of the Court
Upon review of Appellant’s response to this Court’s show cause order of April 14, 2010, we dismiss this appeal because the order on appeal is neither a final order nor a non-final order appealable pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.180. Here, the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) order effectively purports to reserve jurisdiction on the ripe issue of medical benefits. See Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 693 So.2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
DISMISSED.
WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
P.R. v. State, 97 So. 3d 980 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…ellate court is bound by a trial court’s factual findings if they are supported by competent, substantial evidence. Pagan v. State, 830 So. 2d 792, 806 (Fla.2002). However, the application of the law to the facts is reviewed de novo. Dixon v. State, 36 So. 3d 920, 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). The crime of loitering and prowling has two elements: (1) the defendant loitered and prowled “in a place, at a time, or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals,” and (2) the loitering occurred under “circumstance…
-
McKELVIN v. State, 53 So. 3d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…ngly, the court denied McKelvin’s motion to suppress. “In reviewing an order on a motion to suppress, an appellate court should defer to the trial court’s factual findings but review de novo the application of the law to the facts.” Dixon v. State, 36 So. 3d 920, 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). A law [*404] enforcement officer may stop and detain an individual for investigation so long as he has a reasonable suspicion that the individual has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Fuentes v. State…
-
S.J. v. State, 50 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)…y in the vicinity. The trial court denied the motion. “In reviewing an order on a motion to suppress, an appellate court should defer to the trial court’s factual findings but review de novo the application of the law to the facts.” Dixon v. State, 36 So. 3d 920, 923 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). Section 856.021, Florida Statutes, provides, in relevant part: (1) It is unlawful for any person to loiter or prowl in a place, at a time or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals, under circumstances that warr…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co. & Kemper Ins. Co., 693 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)