MICHAEL ANTHONY CAPOZZI, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AFFIRMED. See State v. Calderon, 951 So.2d 1031, 1035 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“An amended statute of limitation which applies retroactively does not violate the ex post facto prohibition if it clearly indicates that it retroactively applies to pending cases not time barred by the old statute.”); Scharfschwerdt v. Kanarek, 553 So.2d 218, 220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (“The legislature can amend statutes of limitations to apply retroactively without running afoul of the constitutional ex post facto prohibition if it (a) does so before the prosecution is barred by the old statute and (b) clearly indicates that the new statute is to apply retroactively to cases pending when it becomes effective.”), rev. denied, 563 So.2d 633 (Fla.1990).
GRIFFIN, PALMER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Cisneros, 106 So. 3d 42 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…male who discussed “skirts” and whether the unidentified male would be “bringing them up here.” Thus there is no allegation that it was Cisneros who discussed transporting the drugs from Fort Myers to Tampa. The State’s reliance on Jackson v. State, 37 So. 3d 370 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), is unavailing because in that case, the appellant conceded his conspiracy charge was properly brought in Hillsborough County. That concession was based on the fact that the other people involved in the conspiracy were in Hillsbor…
-
Favian Rivera v. State, 274 So. 3d 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)
Authorities Cited
- Scharfschwerdt v. The Honorable Paul A. Kanarek, 553 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- State v. Calderon, 951 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007)