GROG HOUSE, INC., D/B/A, GROG HOUSE; C.S. FOODS, INC., D/B/A THE COPPER MONKEY; AND GATOR UGLY, INC., D/B/A GATOR CITY, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANTS
GROG HOUSE, INC., D/B/A, GROG HOUSE; C.S. FOODS, INC., D/B/A THE COPPER MONKEY; AND GATOR UGLY, INC., D/B/A GATOR CITY, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES,
CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANTS
37 So. 3d 969
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We affirm as to all issues raised in the direct appeal. In the cross-appeal, the City challenges the trial court’s order to the extent that it invalidates the final sentence of the ordinance at issue. We affirm the order in this case on the cross appeal without addressing the validity of the last sentence of the ordinance. Any argument the court may have considered to be meritorious on this point was not preserved for review or timely raised in the briefs on the cross appeal.
WOLF, BENTON, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
D.M. v. State, 84 So. 3d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)…od cause shown at any time prior to the beginning of a disposition hearing permit a plea of guilty to be withdrawn_” (Emphasis supplied.) The juvenile rules do not authorize moving to withdraw a plea after the disposition hearing. See P.W. v. State, 37 So. 3d 969 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (stating that the juvenile rules do not authorize a motion to withdraw a plea after disposition); J.M.B. v. State, 750 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (and cases cited therein). For that reason, the tolling provisions [*1244] in ru…