KEVIN M. KLIER, APPELLANT,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL, ETC., APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Witt-Bahls v. Bahls, 193 So. 3d 35 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
  …rt must give the parent the.key to reconnecting with his or her children. An order that does not set forth the specific steps a parent must take to reestablish time-sharing, thus depriving the parent of that key, is deficient — ” Grigsby v. Grigsby, 39 So. 3d 453, 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); see also Davis v. Lopez-Davis, 162 So. 3d 19, 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (quoting Grigsby in holding Judgment was deficient in not setting forth the steps father needed to take in order to establish time sharing). The court her…
• Davis v. Lopez-Davis, 162 So. 3d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
  …blish that it would be detrimental or harmful for the husband to spend time with the child. The judgment is also deficient in that it does not set forth the steps the husband must take to establish timesharing with the child. In Grigsby v. Grigsby, 39 So. 3d 453, 456-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010), the Second District stated that when the court exercises its discretion to restrict or deny visitation, it must clearly set forth the steps the parent must take in order to reestablish time-sharing with the children. Ess…
• Dukes v. Griffin, 230 So. 3d 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
  …e.1 III. The final judgment 'entered below is AFFIRMED. ROBERTS and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR. , See, e.g., Whissell v. Whissell, 222 So. 3d 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); Davis v. Lopez-Davis, 162 So. 3d 19, 21 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Grigsby v. Grigsby, 39 So. 3d 453, 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Ross v. Botha, 867 So. 2d 567, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Some older cases also get cited as precedent for the rule discussed in this opinion, but address a different issue along the lines of.requiring that orders be specific…

Authorities Cited

• Cambas v. Dep't of Bus. & Prof'l Reg., 6 So. 3d 668 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)