PEACHES PHILLIPS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2010-07-14
No. 4D08-3876
POLEN, HAZOURI and GERBER, JJ., concur.
39 So. 3d 535 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wilson v. State, 884 So.2d 74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

POLEN, HAZOURI and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • MC Cray v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
    …a VFOSC. This claim was not preserved for our review. Mr. McCray did not pursue this argument in the trial court. The record reflects that his counsel questioned whether Mr. McCray had the necessary qualifying offense. Cf. Alcantra v. State, 39 So. 3d 535, 537 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) ("When a defendant disputes a prior offense, the sentencing court must either require the State to produce corroborating evidence of the offense or not consider the offense."). The trial court promptly, and properly, dis…
  • Taulbee v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw