JOHN WIBLE, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, AND ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-08-05
No. 1D10-0239
THOMAS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ„ concur.
40 So. 3d 926 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

John R. Wible appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming an appeals referee’s decision holding him to be disqualified from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. By confession of error, the Commission acknowledges that its decision failed to take into consideration this court’s rulings in Doig v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 862 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), and Seneca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 39 So.3d 385 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), which hold that in circumstances such as those present here, a claimant is not disqualified from benefits. In accordance with the Commission’s confession of error, we reverse the final order being appealed herein, and remand the *927matter to the Commission for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …in order to take a better paying job disqualifies an employee later terminated without good cause from receiving unemployment compensation benefits. In recent cases, the Commission has conceded as much. See Wible v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 40 So. 3d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). See also Doig v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 862 So. 2d 76, 79 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). We reverse the final order and remand the matter to the Commission for further proceedings. Reversed and remanded. BENTON, VAN NORTWIC…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw