MICHAEL S. RITTER, PETITIONER,
v.
WALTER A. MCNEIL, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-07-23
No. 1D10-2828
HAWKES, C.J., and LEWIS, J., concur. BENTON J., would issue an order to show cause.
41 So. 3d 366 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature. See Rodriguez v. State, 21 So.3d 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (table) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as premature where petitioner’s last pleading was delivered to the trial court less than 60 days before).

HAWKES, C.J., and LEWIS, J., concur. BENTON J., would issue an order to show cause.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Howe v. State, 187 So. 3d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature. See Ritter v. McNeil, 41 So. 3d 366 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw