PEDRO COLLAZO, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2010-08-19
No. 5D10-2651
TORPY, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ„ concur.
42 So. 3d 339 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks a Writ of Prohibition based upon the expiration of the statute of limitations on a second-degree felony charge. The trial court denied Petitioner’s *340motion to dismiss after an evidentiary hearing. Although the crime occurred and a warrant issued in 2000, Petitioner was not arrested on the charge until 2008. Respondent acknowledges that the statute of limitations for the charged crime is three years but urges that the tolling provision of subsection 775.15(6), Florida Statutes (2001), applies. That particular subsection, however, is expressly limited to three years which would only extend the statute to 2006. The Respondent having failed in its burden to show diligence in execution of the warrant before the statute expired, Petitioner is entitled to discharge.

Accordingly, we grant the Writ and order Petitioner’s release on the second-degree felony charge.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition GRANTED.

TORPY, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bowers v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 2024)
    …the constitutional speedy trial claim without further discussion, but we grant the petition as to the burglary of a dwelling charge because that count is barred by the statute of limitations. § 775.15(2)(b), Fla. Stat. (2022); cf. Collazo v. State, 42 So. 3d 339, 340 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (granting writ of prohibition based upon the expiration of the statute of limitations on a second-degree felony charge). In this case, the State argues that, while the statute of limitations on the burglary of a dwelling ch…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw