ROBERT J. HOSIER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT J. HOSIER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
42 So. 3d 838
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Moore v. State, 882 So.2d 977 (Fla.2004).
GROSS, C.J., WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kerven Charles v. State, 223 So. 3d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)…urt’s procedure of deciding the issue of competency on the basis of Dr. Brannon’s written report alone. We also note that, contrary to appellant’s suggestion, the trial court was not required to appoint a minimum of: two experts. See Tita v. State, 42 So. 3d 838, 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (explaining that the relevant statute and rule of criminal procedure were amended to remove the requirement for a court to appoint no-fewer than two experts). Finally, the fact that Dr. Brannon’s report was not.filed in the…
Authorities Cited
- Geanetta Moore v. State, 882 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 2004)