IN RE AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.853
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court adopted proposed amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853(c)(7) to correct the identification of accrediting organizations that certify private DNA testing laboratories eligible to perform postconviction DNA testing.
The Court adopted the proposed amendments to rule 3.853(c)(7), replacing the inaccurately identified accrediting bodies with the correct organizations: the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors (ASCLD/LAB) and Forensic Quality Services, Inc. (FQS). The amendments became effective immediately upon release of the opinion.
[1] Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853(c)(7) is amended to accurately identify accrediting organizations for private DNA testing laboratories.
[2] A trial court may order DNA testing by a private laboratory if the laboratory is certified by an appropriate accrediting body, such as ASCLD/LAB or FQS.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The Committee explains that subdivision (c)(7) of rule 3.853 inaccurately identifies the accrediting organizations that certify private DNA testing laboratories.”
Establishes the problem the amendments were designed to address
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Florida Bar's Criminal Procedure Rules Committee filed a report proposing amendments to rule 3.853(c)(7) identifying the correct accrediting organ…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Postconviction Dna Testing cases and more on FLexlaw
This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 (Motion for Postconviction DNA Testing). We have jurisdiction. See ai't. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.
The Florida Bar’s Criminal Procedure Rules Committee (Committee) filed an out-of-cycle report on December 21, 2009, proposing amendments to rule 3.853(c)(7), pertaining to the circumstances upon which a trial court may order DNA testing by a laboratory other than one operated by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement or its designee. The Committee’s proposal, published by the Court in the February 10, 2010, edition of The Florida Bar News, did not prompt the filing of any comments.
The Committee explains that subdivision (c)(7) of rule 3.853 inaccurately identifies the accrediting organizations that certify private DNA testing laboratories. Without certification from one of the accrediting bodies named in the rule, however, a laboratory is ineligible to perform DNA testing as an alternative to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement or its designee. The Committee’s proposal, accordingly, names the correct organizations in substitution for the named accrediting bodies either misidentified or no longer responsible for private laboratory accreditation.
Upon consideration of the Committee’s report, we hereby adopt the proposed amendments to rule 3.853(c)(7), as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective immediately upon release of this opinion.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
APPENDIX
RULE 3.853. MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING
(a)-(b) [No change]
(c) Procedure
(l)-(6) [No change]
(7) The court-ordered DNA testing shall be ordered to be conducted by the Department of Law Enforcement or its designee, as provided by statute. However, the court, upon a showing of good cause, may order testing by another laboratory or agency certified by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors or the --National Forensic Science Training-Ganter/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB) or Forensic Quality Services, Inc. (FQS) if requested by a movant who can bear the cost of such testing.
*689(8) [No change]
(d)-(f) [No change]