ROY LEE ICON, III, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2010-09-24
No. 5D09-1417
SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
44 So. 3d 660 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Roy Lee Icon, III appeals his convictions of two counts of aggravated battery and one count of robbery with a firearm. Icon contends that convicting him of two counts of aggravated battery for a single act against a single victim violates double jeopardy principles. The State properly concedes error. Accordingly, we vacate one of Icon’s aggravated battery convictions. We find no merit in the other issues raised by Icon and affirm his other conviction of aggravated battery and robbery with a firearm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Riley Leonard Griffis, Jr. v. State, 163 So. 3d 1256 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …045(l)(a)2.; 784.045(1)(a)1., Fla. Stat. (2012). The state properly concedes that one of the two convictions must be vacated, as the dual convictions constitute a violation of his constitutional protection against double jeopardy. See Icon v. State, 44 So. 3d 660, 660 (Fla. 5th DCA [*1257] 2010); Cook v. State, 813 So. 2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Maxwell v. State, 803 So. 2d 815, 820 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). We reverse and remand to the trial court with directions that the court vacate the conviction and…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw