JAMES ADKISON, APPELLANT,
v.
DEBRA JEAN OWENS, A/K/A, DEBRA OWENS, A/K/A, DEBORAH J. OWENS, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-09-30
No. 1D10-0759
HAWKES, C.J., WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
44 So. 3d 1219 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal filed on February 3, 2010, failed to timely invoke the Court’s jurisdiction to review the Final Judgment, which was rendered on November 17, 2009. Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h); see St. Moritz Hotel v. Daughtry, 249 So.2d 27 (Fla.1971); Churchville v. Ocean Grove R.V. Sales, Inc., 876 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Maxfly Aviation Inc. v. Capital Airlines Ltd., 843 So.2d 973 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, the appellee’s Motion to Dismiss, filed on June 3, 2010, is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

HAWKES, C.J., WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Boston v. State, 260 So. 3d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018)
  • Jackson v. Leon Cnty. Elections Canvassing Bd., 204 So. 3d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …legal remedies.”). Because the [*577] circuit court was the proper forum for resolving this elections challenge, the trial court.had no discretion to. stay the proceedings for the City Commission to conduct its own proceeding. See Martinez v. State, 44 So. 3d 1219, 1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (granting petition for writ of mandamus to compel trial court to hold evidentia-ry hearing required under the “Stand Your Ground” statute). Because of the time constraints surrounding this challenge, mandamus was Jackson’s…
  • Deodat Satyanand v. State, 147 So. 3d 662 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
    …; Legene v. State, 60 So. 3d 1154 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (holding that defendant was entitled to receive mandamus relief and ordering the trial court to conduct a hearing on his motion to dismiss, claiming immunity from prosecution); Martinez v. State, 44 So. 3d 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that the defendant was entitled to receive mandamus relief because he had a legal right to receive a pretrial evidentiary hearing on his immunity claim). Accordingly, we grant the mandamus relief requested. PETITION GR…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw