JESSE COLLINS, APPELLANT,

v.

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Kimon Black v. State, 59 So. 3d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)
  …. “The right to counsel established by Miranda is a procedural safeguard that is not a right itself protected by the Constitution but is instead a measure to protect the Fifth Amendment right against compulsory self-incrimination.” Spivey v. State, 45 So. 3d 51, 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citing Davis, 512 U.S. at 457, 114 S.Ct. 2350).…
• Jahmahree Daniel v. State, 238 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
  …n of law de novo. Delhall v. State, 95 So. 3d 134, 150 (Fla. 2012) ; Pagan v. State, 830 So. 2d 792, 806 (Fla. 2002). A suspect has the right to consult with an attorney and to have an attorney present during custodial questioning. Spivey v. State, 45 So. 3d 51, 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citing Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 469-73, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) ). "If a suspect clearly and unequivocally requests counsel at any time during a custodial interview, the interrogation must immediately s…
• Baptiste v. State, 179 So. 3d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …rries a presumption of correctness. We give deference to the trial court’s factual findings if they are supported by - competent, substantial evidence but we review the, trial court’s determination of constitutional rights de novo.” Spivey v. State, 45 So. 3d 51, 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citations -omitted). A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress is reviewed for harmless error. See Scott v. State, 151 So. 3d 567, 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). [*506] Appellant argues the trial court erred in denying his mo…