VICTORIA REVIER, APPELLANT,
v.
LARRY LEE REVIER, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2010-10-20
No. 4D07-2702
GROSS, C.J., FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
45 So. 3d 570 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Topics
Ripeness For Appellate Review Final Judgment Of Dissolution Of Marriage Attorney'S Fees Entitlement Ripeness

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ripeness For Appellate Review cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, the former wife challenges a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We have carefully considered the arguments on appeal and find no error or abuse of discretion in regard to the trial court’s designation, valuation, or distribution of marital and non-marital assets, dates of valuation of marital assets, imputation of income to the former wife, or failure to award alimony. Accordingly, we affirm the final judgment of dissolution. We dismiss that aspect of the final judgment as it relates to the award of attorney’s fees since the trial court determined only entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future day. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130, 131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (dismissing appeal from order determining only entitlement to attorney’s fees as not ripe for appellate review); Knight v. Mastrianni, 626 So.2d 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (declining to review order granting attorney’s fees because it did not fix amount awarded, meaning issue was not ripe for review).

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

GROSS, C.J., FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Schmidt v. Schmidt, 319 So. 3d 65 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021)
    …hat Former Husband was entitled to attorney’s fees in connection with the motion for contempt, it did not award an amount. An order merely finding entitlement to attorney’s fees is a non-final, non-appealable order. See, e.g., Revier v. Revier, 45 So. 3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“We dismiss [the] aspect of the final judgment as it relates to the award of attorney’s fees since the trial court determined 2 only entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future day.”); Winkelma…
  • Brennan v. Brennan, 184 So. 3d 583 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)
    …hould be “vacated.” Rather, because the Second Remand Judgment determined entitlement but did not determine the amount of the alimony credit, the issue has not been determined with finality and is not ripe for appellate review. Cf. Revier v. Revier, 45 So. 3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“We dismiss that aspect of the final judgment as it relates to the award of attorney’s fees since the trial court determined only' entitlement and reserved the determination of amount for a future day.”). Before the trial…
  • Tomasita D. Crowell v. Crowell, 72 So. 3d 804 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)
    …e’s appeal of the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees to the former husband. Because the trial court only determined entitlement and did not determine the amount of fees, this issue is not ripe for appellate consideration. Revier v. Revier, 45 So. 3d 570, 571 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). REVERSED and REMANDED in part; DISMISSED in part. GRIFFIN, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw