WENZEL BELGRAM AND GAYLE BELGRAM, APPELLANTS,
v.
SCOTT KRUEGER AND CYNTHIA KRUEGER, APPELLEES
WENZEL BELGRAM AND GAYLE BELGRAM, APPELLANTS,
SCOTT KRUEGER AND CYNTHIA KRUEGER, APPELLEES
46 So. 3d 120
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010)
Opinion of the Court
We conclude, as the trial court did, that the escrow agreement entered into by the parties was clear and unambiguous. See Abis v. Tudin, D.V.M., P.A., 18 So.3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (whether ambiguity exists is question of law). Based on the undisputed facts in the record, Appellees were entitled to summary judgment.
AFFIRMED.
LAWSON, EVANDER, and COHEN, JJ., concur.