STATE EX REL. SOVEREIGN CAMP, WOODMEN OF THE WORLD,
v.
HALIFAX HOSPITAL DISTRICT, ET AL.

Fla. | 1933-10-03
Davis, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, and Terrell, J. J., concur. Ellis and Brown, J. J., dissent., Buford,--J., disqualified.
112 Fla. 223 Florida Supreme Court (1933) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 150 So. 517
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Upon the authority of the opinion and orders made in the case of State of Florida, ex rel. T. V. Buckwalter, et al., v. City of Lakeland, et al., this day filed *224in this Court, the demurrer and motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus herein are severally denied; and the demurrer to the answer of the respondents to such alternative writ of mandamus herein, is sustained, with leave to the respondents to within ten days plead further if so advised.

It is so ordered.

Davis, C. J., and Wi-iitfield, and Terrell, J. J., concur. Ellis and Brown, J. J., dissent.

Buford,--J., disqualified.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • City of Winter Haven v. State, 114 Fla. 527 (Fla. 1934)
    …h it by mandamus, unless it furnishes or provides some adequate source of payment from other funds. See State, ex rel. Buckwalter v. City of Lakeland, 112 Fla. 200, 150 Sou. Rep. 508; State, ex rel. Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. Halifax Hospital Dist., 112 Fla. 223, 150 Sou. Rep. 517. In such cases the “first come first served” rule determines priorities where mandamus is resorted to for the purpose of enforcing payment out of an existing fund in hand that is inadequate to pay all. State, ex rel. DuPont Ball,…
  • State v. Dunaway, 113 Fla. 252 (Fla. 1933)
    …judge in favor of the constitutionality of the Act in question, this Court in the cases of State, ex rel. Buckwalter v. Lakeland, 112 Fla. 200, 150 Sou. Rep. 508 (opinion filed October 3, 1933), and State, ex rel. W. O. W. v. Halifax Hospital Dist., 112 Fla. 223, 150 Sou. Rep. 517 (opinion filed October 3, 1933), has adjudged that said Chapter 16075, Acts of 1933, is unconstitutional as violative of Section 10 of Article I of the Constitution of .the United States, as well as Section 17 of the Bill of Right…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw