HENRY B. SPECHLER AND RUTH B. SPECHLER, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,

v.

WALLER VAN FLEET, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Wilkerson v. Wilkerson, 179 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)
  …nd of all offenses whether committed prior or subsequent to the condonation.” Kollar, supra, at 708; 21 So. 2d at 357. In addition, condonation is an affirmative defense which the party asserting it must prove, Mickler v. Mickler, Fla.App.2, 1958, 101 So. 2d 157; and since it is a question of fact, the chancellor’s finding on the issue [*600] comes to an appellate court clothed in a presumption of correctness, Katz v. Katz, Fla.App.3, 1964, 159 So. 2d 241. The record in this case contains sufficient eviden…
• Hieber v. Hieber, 151 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)
  …cchi, Fla.1958, 100 So. 2d 627; Evans v. Evans, Fla. 1954, 70 So. 2d 506; Joannou v. Joannou, Fla.App.1960, 117 So. 2d 40; King v. King, Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 259; Talbot v. Talbot, Fla.App.1958, 104 So. 2d 410; Mickler v. Mickler, Fla. App.1958, 101 So. 2d 157. From our examination of the agreement and the evidence adduced by the parties, we have also concluded that there is no merit in appellee’s contention that the agreement was against public policy. Finally, we find no merit to the appellee’s conten…
• Jerri Pollak v. Pollak, 196 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
  …support for that ruling. The chancellor was entitled to regard the record as showing there was an absence of forgiveness by the husband, essential for condonation. Seiferth v. Seiferth, Fla.App.1961, 132 So. 2d 471; Mickler v. Mickler, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 157. No useful purpose would be served by detailing the facts revealed by the evidence. We find no basis in the record to hold that the awards of custody represented an abuse of discretion, or were not for the best interests of the children- — a consid…

Authorities Cited

• Lindgren v. Waller van Fleet, 101 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958)