EDWIN JOSE GARRIDO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2010-10-20
No. 4D08-4613
GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.
47 So. 3d 341 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2010) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Farinas v. State, 569 So.2d 425, 429 n. 7 (Fla.1990) (“It is well-established law that where the trial judge has extended counsel an opportunity to cure any error, and counsel fails to take advantage of the opportunity, such error, if any, was invited and will not warrant reversal.”) (citation omitted).

GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and KEYSER, JANIS BRUSTARES, Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Garrido v. State, 162 So. 3d 1069 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
    …ense was prejudiced. This Court affirmed based on the principle of “invited error,” because defense counsel rejected the trial judge’s offer of a mistrial or a continuance to prepare a defense to the newly-disclosed range of dates. Garrido v. State, 47 So. 3d 341 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (citing Farinas v. State, 569 So. 2d 425, 429 n. 7 (Fla.1990)). In his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, defendant raised nine grounds, including that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel…
  • Reynaldo Fradera v. Fradera (Fla. 5th DCA 2022)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw