JUAN VAZQUEZ AND ZORAIMA VAZQUEZ, APPELLANTS,

v.

RAFAEL MARRERO ARISTY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Dep't OF Revenue & Mark Cole Cruickshank v. Graczyk, 206 So. 3d 157 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
  …early erroneous. Kale v. Dep’t of Health, 175 So. 3d [*160] 815, 817 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). “An administrative agency has only such power as granted by the Legislature and may not expand its own jurisdiction.” Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Smith v. Selles, 47 So. 3d 916, 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citation omitted). DOR “is designated as the state agency responsible for the administration of the child support enforcement program, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ss. 651 et seq.” § 409.2557(1), Fla. St…
• Wash. Cnty. v. Nw. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 85 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)
  …D in part; REVERSED in part. WOLF and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur. . Formerly section 373.0361. See Ch. 10-205, §§ 1, 28, Laws of Fla. . We review the District’s rulings on jurisdiction and standing de novo. See Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Smith v. Selles, 47 So. 3d 916, 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("Whether a lower tribunal had subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law which we review de novo."); Mid-Chattahoochee River Users v. Fla. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot, 948 So. 2d 794, 796 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) ("Whether a part…
• Dep't OF Revenue v. Syndi Vanamburg and Alejandro Jesus Ramirez, 174 So. 3d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
  …to rule on the motion for rehearing given that the underlying order had been appealed. “ ‘An administrative agency has only such power as granted by the Legislature and may not expand its own jurisdiction.’” Dep’t of Revenue ex rel. Smith v. Selles, 47 So. 3d 916, 918 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (citation omitted). Whether a lower tribunal has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law that is reviewable de novo. Id. Lack of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal. Id. Subject ma…

Authorities Cited

• Plana v. Sainz, 990 So. 2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008)