JERROLD WINGATE AND THE WINGATE LAW FIRM, APPELLANTS,
v.
CELEBRITY CRUISES, ET AL., APPELLEES
JERROLD WINGATE AND THE WINGATE LAW FIRM, APPELLANTS,
CELEBRITY CRUISES, ET AL., APPELLEES
47 So. 3d 934
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2010)
Caution
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellants, Jerrold Wingate and The Wingate Law Firm, appeal from an Order of Contempt, finding them in contempt for willfully disobeying the lower tribunal’s prior court order and knowingly receiving money in violation of that order. Following our review of the order, we agree with the appellants that the Order of Contempt contains a mathematical error, and therefore, remand with directions to enter an amended order, reflecting that appellants must repay $219,653.07, not $333,727.74. In all other respects, we affirm, finding that the appellants’ remaining argument lacks merit.
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
A.B. v. State, 141 So. 3d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…lming,” but argues the evidence was sufficient to submit the case to the trier of fact. “We apply a de novo standard of review for a motion for judgment of dismissal.” Q.J.L. v. State, 120 So. 3d 150, 153 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (quoting J.T. v. State, 47 So. 3d 934, 935-36 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)). “A motion for judgment of dismissal should be granted in a circumstantial evidence case if the State fails to present evidence from which the judge can exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of guilt.” D.F.J. v…
-
Q.J.L. v. State, 120 So. 3d 150 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…for judgment of dismissal because the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt of attempted burglary of a residence and criminal mischief. We agree. “We apply a de novo standard of review for a motion for judgment of dismissal.” J.T. v. State, 47 So. 3d 934, 935-36 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). The trial court articulated the circumstantial nature of the evidence and how most of the State’s evidence failed to prove anything. The evidence consisted of similar shoe prints found near the broken window, dirt in th…
-
C.W. v. State, 205 So. 3d 843 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…aded and operable); Depasquale v. State, 438 So. 2d 159, 160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (holding that a BB gun was a deadly weapon when it had the capability to cause great bodily [*845] harm and was used in the course of a robbery); see also J.T. v. State, 47 So. 3d 934, 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that whether, a BB gun was a deadly weapon was a question for the jury when the State presented evidence that the BB gun was loaded and capable of causing great bodily harm even though there was no evidence that the…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence