HENRY O. PARTIN, ET AL.,
v.
CITIZENS STATE BANK OF ST. CLOUD
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its1 judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court'that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
(concurring). — The final decree shows on its face that it was entered pursuant to stipulation of counsel and therefore we must assume that material facts not shown to have been proven were by stipulation admitted, — absent the contents of the stipulation appearing in the record.
Buford, J.
(concurring). — The final decree shows on its face that it was entered pursuant to stipulation of counsel and therefore we must assume that material facts not shown to have been proven were by stipulation admitted, — absent the contents of the stipulation appearing in the record.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
de Groot v. Sheffield, 95 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 1957)…ll hearing pursuant to notice based on evidence submitted in accordance with the statute here involved. This being so its ultimate decision was subject to judicial review in an appropriate proceeding. State ex rel. Williams v. Whitman, 116 Fla. 196, 150 So. 136, 156 So. 705, 95 A.L.R. 1416; West Flagler Amusement Co. v. State Racing Commission, 122 Fla. 222, 165 So. 64; State ex rel. Hathaway v. Williams, 149 Fla. 48, 5 So. 2d 269; Hammond v. Curry, 153 Fla. 245, 14 So. 2d 390. Having determined the natur…
-
Robertson v. Indus. Ins. Co., 75 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 1954)…n a cause of revocation arising subsequent to the lawful licensing of a practitioner, such as misconduct and malpractice occurring in the course of one’s professional activities.” (Emphasis supplied.) State ex rel. Williams v. Whitman, 116 Fla. 196, 150 So. 136, 156 So. 705, 707, 95 A.L.R. 1416; State ex rel. Sbordy v. Rowlett, 125 Fla. 562, 170 So. 311. In regard to the second issue presented for determination; namely, whether ■or not the rule of absolute privilege pertaining to judicial proceedings exte…
-
Hadley v. Dep't OF Admin., 411 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 1982)….2d 172 (1977). Thus the formalities requisite in judicial proceedings are not necessary in order to meet due process requirements in the administrative process. The observations made by this Court in State ex rel. Williams v. Whitman, 116 Fla. 196, 150 So. 136, 156 So. 705 (1934), regarding proceedings before the state board of dental examiners are relevant here: [CJharges before boards, such as the state board of dental examiners, need not be stated with the technical nicety or formal exactness required…
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence