ERICA KAY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERICA KAY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
48 So. 3d 152
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
REVERSED. See Yerrick v. State, 979 So.2d 1228, 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (“Florida law provides that to prove the crime of grand theft, the State must establish the defendant had the requisite criminal intent at the time of the taking.”); Benitez v. State, 852 So.2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Crawford v. State, 453 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
BENTON, C.J., THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Huggins v. State, 135 So. 3d 306 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…k v. State, 979 So. 2d 1228, 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding “Florida law provides that to prove the crime of grand theft, the State must establish the defendant had the requisite criminal intent at the time of the taking.”). Accord, Kay v. State, 48 So. 3d 152, 153 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). The facts here are analogous with those in Crawford v. State, 453 So. 2d 1139, 1140-41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984): [The victim] contacted [the appellant] about fixing the roof on her house.... [Appellant] told her the labor and m…
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. Troiano, 453 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- Benitez v. State, 852 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
- Yerrick v. State, 979 So. 2d 1228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)