MICHAEL BRADSHEER, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, ET AL., RESPONDENTS
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Bradsheer v. Florida Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 20 So.3d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), based on express and direct conflict with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Doyon v. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 902 So.2d 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). After further consideration of the issues involved, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion to deny review. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (32 total)
-
McCRAY v. State, 71 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 2011)…tings, McCRAY questioned each of them about the events surrounding his February arrest and the other parties’ involvement in that arrest; McCRAY wanted to know who had alerted the police to him. As this Court recently explained in McGirth v. State, 48 So. 3d 777, 786-87 (Fla.2010): An appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s determination that evidence is relevant and admissible absent an abuse of discretion. Relevant evidence is generally admissible unless precluded by a specific rule of exclusion…
-
Wadada Delhall v. State, 95 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 2012)…cumulative evidence.” Miller, 42 So. 3d at 224; see also § 90.402-.403, Fla. Stat. (2008). “An appellate court will not disturb a trial court’s determination that evidence is relevant and admissible absent an abuse of discretion.” McGirth v. State, 48 So. 3d 777, 786 (Fla.2010). A trial court’s discretion is limited by the rules of evidence and the principles of stare decisis. Johnson v. State, 969 So. 2d 938, 949 (Fla.2007). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the ev…
-
Gosciminski v. State, 132 So. 3d 678 (Fla. 2013)…ribe the events leading up to” the commission of the charged offense. Id. The evidence at issue here explained Gosciminski’s decision to kill Loughman for her jewelry and showed the sequence of events leading up to the murder. See McGirth v. State, 48 So. 3d 777, 786-87 (Fla.2010), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 131 S.Ct. 2100, 179 L.Ed.2d 898 (2011) (finding evidence about the defendant’s drug-based relationship with the victims’ daughter was relevant and inextricably intertwined with the crimes charged). Through…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bradsheer v. Fla. Dep't OF Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 20 So. 3d 915 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
- Jabir Fort v. State, 902 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Doyon v. Dep't OF Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 902 So. 2d 842 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)