WILLIAM E. PACE, APPELLANT,
v.
BLUE LLC, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 5th DCA | 2010-12-03
No. 5D09-2135
GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ„ and PERRY, B., Associate Judge, concur.
48 So. 3d 1000 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2010)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the judgment against the Trustee but remanded to determine if the individual was a party, as judgment against a non-party is fundamental error.


Facts & Procedural History

The third amended complaint named William E. Pace individually and as Trustee, but a subsequent court order clarified that only the Trustee was the so…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s final judgment as to William E. Pace, as Trustee of the Earl H. Pace Irrevocable Trust. We must, however, remand this case to the trial court to determine whether William E. Pace, individually, was a party to this proceeding due to inconsistencies in the *1001record regarding the parties to this lawsuit. The entry of a judgment against a non-party is fundamental error, notwithstanding the lack of objection. Beseau v. Bhalani, 904 So.2d 641, 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).

While the third amended complaint, filed May 9, 2008, upon which this matter went to trial, names William E. Pace, individually, and as Trustee, Pace had moved to change the style of the case to reflect the actual status of pleadings docketed on or about July 11, 2008. The trial court, on November 18, 2008, entered an order on Paces motion stating the defendant William E. Pace, Trustee of the Earl H. Pace Irrevocable Trust, is the sole party defendant regardless of any other names under which he may have been or currently is known. The record presented to this court is unclear as to whether William E. Pace was individually a party to this case.

Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court to determine whether or not William E. Pace, individually, was a party to this proceeding, and to enter an amended judgment reflecting the same.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ„ and PERRY, B., Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw