HOWARD DALE SNIPES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Howard Dale Snipes appealed the denial of his Rule 3.850 postconviction relief motion. The appellate court found that Snipes was abusing the judicial process through repetitive pro se filings and prohibited him from filing further pro se pleadings in this case without Bar counsel.
The court held that Snipes is abusing the judicial process and must be barred from filing any further pro se pleadings concerning the Orange County case in this Court. Any future pro se filings will be summarily rejected by the Clerk unless filed by a Florida Bar member in good standing.
[1] A court may prohibit a party from filing further pro se pleadings concerning a specific conviction when the party has engaged in repeated, unpersuasive postconviction cha…
[2] A court may direct the Clerk of Court to reject all future pro se filings from a party concerning a specific case, unless signed by a licensed attorney.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings”
States the court's holding on whether Snipes' repeated filings constitute abuse of process
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceSnipes filed a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in Orange County case number 04-CF-9832. The tria…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Filings cases and more on FLexlaw
ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Appellant, Howard Dale Snipes, appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. After reviewing his filings on appeal, we issued a Spencer 1 show cause order directing Snipes to demonstrate why he should not be barred from filing further pro se challenges to his convictions and sentences in this case. Having considered Snipes’ response and finding it to be unpersuasive, we conclude that he is abusing the judicial process and should be barred from further pro se filings.
Therefore, we now prohibit Howard Dale Snipes from filing with this Court any more pro se pleadings concerning Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit Court case number 04-CF-9832. The Clerk of this Court is directed not to accept any further pro se filings from Snipes concerning this case. Any additional pleadings regarding this case will be summarily rejected by the Clerk, unless they are filed by a member in good standing of the Florida Bar. See Johnson v. State, 652 So.2d 980, 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (prohibiting petitioner from-filing further pro se pleadings with this Court after thirteen challenges to conviction and sentence); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 411 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (“Enough is enough.”). The Clerk is further directed to forward a certified copy of this opinion to the appropriate institution for consideration of disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2010); Simpkins v. State, 909 So.2d 427, 428 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005).
AFFIRMED; future pro se filings PROHIBITED; certified opinion FORWARDED to Department of Corrections.
MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA, and JACOBUS, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Isley v. State, 652 So. 2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Simpkins v. State, 909 So. 2d 427 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)
- Johnson v. State, 652 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)