CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND SCIBAL ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, APPELLANTS,
v.
LANCE KRAEMER, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-12-14
No. 1D10-3048
Van Nortwick, J., Lewis, J., Clark, J.
49 So. 3d 339 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court reversed an award of attorney's fees and costs in a workers' compensation case because the claimant failed to establish a successful claim for medical benefits only, while affirming the denial of neuromuscular massage therapy for lack of medical necessity.


Holding

Attorney's fees and costs cannot be awarded under the medical-only provision of section 440.34(3)(a) when the claimant fails to successfully assert a claim for medical benefits only.


Headnotes

[1] Attorney's fees under the medical-only provision of section 440.34(3)(a), Florida Statutes, cannot be awarded when the claimant fails to successfully assert a claim for m…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

In a workers' compensation case, the claimant sought neuromuscular massage therapy. The employer/carrier defended by asserting the matter was subject …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, the Employer/Carrier appeals an award of attorney’s fees and costs, and Claimant cross-appeals the denial of a claim for neu-romuscular massage therapy. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees and costs, and affirm the denial of neuromuscular massage therapy.

The Employer/Carrier defended the claim for therapy by asserting the matter was not within the jurisdiction of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) because it was subject to utilization review, and by asserting that it was not medically necessary. The JCC concluded the claim was within his jurisdiction, but denied it because Claimant failed to prove it was medically necessary. We do not disturb the JCC’s conclusion that Claimant failed *340to prove the therapy was medically necessary. Although the Judge of Compensation Claims stated in the order that Claimant was seeking attorney’s fees under the “medical only” provision of section 440.34(3)(a), Florida Statutes, he awarded Claimant attorney’s fees and costs from the Employer/Carrier for “establishing jurisdiction.” This was clearly erroneous because Claimant did not.successfully assert a claim for medical benefits only. Consequently, the award of attorney’s fees and costs is REVERSED. The denial of neu-romuscular massage therapy is .AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw