JAMES A. YATES, ET AL.,
v.
ST. JOHNS BEACH DEVELOPMENT CO., ET AL.
JAMES A. YATES, ET AL.,
ST. JOHNS BEACH DEVELOPMENT CO., ET AL.
112 Fla. 229
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 150 So. 284
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of appellees to dismiss the appeal and “plea in bar of appeal,” and the motion of appellants to strike said “plea in bar of appeal,” and certain affidavits filed by appellants in opposition to the motion to dismiss the appeal, all *230of which have been dúly considered, together with the briefs' and argument of counsel;
It is considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that said motion to dismiss the appeal in this caus'e be and the same is hereby denied, and the motion of appellants to strike said plea in bar of appeal be and the same is hereby granted and said plea in bar of appeal is' hereby stricken.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Yates v. St. Johns Beach Dev. Co., 118 Fla. 788 (Fla. 1935)…Davis, J. This is another episode in the litigation previously considered by this Court in the following phases: Yates v. Peninsular Securities Corp., 107 Fla. 802, 144 Sou. Rep. 664, 145 Sou. Rep. 69; Yates v. St. Johns Beach Development Co., 112 Fla. 229, 150 Sou. Rep. 284. The present case is now before us on an appeal from an order dismissing the complainant’s second amended bill of complaint for want of equity. The bill as amended alleged that certain individual defendants desiring to acquire la…