EDWARD CHARLES AHEARN, APPELLANT,
v.
ELISSA DOROTHY AHEARN, APPELLEE
EDWARD CHARLES AHEARN, APPELLANT,
ELISSA DOROTHY AHEARN, APPELLEE
101 So. 2d 400
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the decree appealed from, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the decree is
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C.J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
McCASKILL v. State, 344 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 1977)…f the trial judge to do so. The failure of the trial judge to comply with Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.390(b) under the circumstances of this cause was not prejudicial error. See Matire v. State, 232 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970); Coggins v. State, 101 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). In accordance with our approval of the death penalty statute in State v. Dixon, supra, our final responsibility in this cause is to “review [the] case in light of the other decisions and determine whether or not the [*1279] puni…
-
Coppolino v. State, 223 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)…ers is of the opinion that error was committed which injuriously affected the substantial rights of the appellant. It shall not be presumed that error injuriously affected the substantial rights of the appellant.” In Coggins v. State, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 400, the defendant was charged with first degree murder. He appeared at trial in a Marine uniform bearing the chevron of a corporal. The State introduced testimony of defendant’s bad conduct while in the service, ostensibly for the purpose of showing th…
-
Simpson v. State, 211 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)…. Furthermore, it appears that there was other sufficient competent evidence, disregarding the confession, to sustain the finding of guilt and the error, if any, was at worst harmless. See Fla.Stat. § 924.33, F.S.A.; Coggins v. State, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 400. The appellant next contends that the trial court erred in failing to give a cautionary instruction on how to consider and treat the confessions admitted into evidence. Examination of the record indicates that the Court did give a specific charge o…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence