STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JUSTIN WARNER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State appealed a circuit court's withholding of adjudication and failure to revoke a driver's license in an aggravated fleeing and eluding case. The court held that Florida Statute § 316.1935(6) prohibited the withholding of adjudication and mandatory driver's license revocation and reversed the judgment.
The court held that § 316.1935(6) clearly prohibits withholding adjudication of guilt for aggravated fleeing and eluding violations and that § 316.1935(5) mandates driver's license revocation for a period of not less than one year nor exceeding five years. The more specific statute prevails over the general downward departure statute.
[1] A court shall revoke the driver's license of any operator convicted of aggravated fleeing and eluding.
[2] No court may suspend, defer, or withhold adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence for any violation of the aggravated fleeing and eluding statute.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“no court may suspend, defer, or withhold adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence for any violation of this section”
Establishes the mandatory nature of adjudication in aggravated fleeing and eluding cases under § 316.1935(6)
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe defendant was charged with aggravated fleeing and eluding and open carrying of a weapon. The circuit court offered to withhold adjudication and pl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Driver'S License Revocation cases and more on FLexlaw
The issue presented is whether the circuit court erred in -withholding adjudication of guilt and failing to revoke the driver’s license of a defendant who committed aggravated fleeing and eluding. We find that section 316.1935, Florida Statutes (2008), prohibited the court from withholding adjudication of guilt and required the court to revoke the defendant’s driver’s license. Therefore, we reverse.
The state charged the defendant with aggravated fleeing and eluding and open carrying of a weapon. At a hearing, the circuit court offered that if the defendant pled no contest to the charges, the court would withhold adjudication of the defendant’s guilt and would place the defendant on probation for eighteen months. The defendant responded that he wished to accept the offer. The court asked the state if it objected to the agreement. The state responded “yes.” The court then asked the state if the court’s offer was “nonetheless a legal sentence.” The state responded, “No. According to the statute[,] fleeing and alluding [sic] should be an adjudication with a one year [license] revocation.” Despite the state’s objection, the court stated that it was not going to adjudicate the defendant for the following reasons: “[T]his defendant has no prior history of criminal activity, has led a law[-]abiding life for a substantial period of time before the commission of the present offense, and I find [this] to be an offense that was committed in an unsophisticated manner[;] it was an isolated incident for which this defendant has shown remorse.” The court then accepted the defendant’s plea, withheld adjudication, and placed the defendant on probation. The state renewed its objection to the sentence before the hearing concluded.
This appeal followed. The state argues that section 316.1935, Florida Statutes (2008), prohibited the court from withholding adjudication and required the court to revoke the defendant’s driver’s license. We agree with the state. Section 316.1935, entitled “Fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer; aggravated fleeing or eluding,” provides, in pertinent part:
(5) The court shall revoke, for a period not less than 1 year nor exceeding 5 years, the driver’s license of any operator of a motor vehicle convicted of a violation of subsection (1), subsection (2), subsection (3), or subsection (4).
(6) ... [N]o court may suspend, defer, or withhold adjudication of guilt or imposition of sentence for any violation of this section....
§ 316.1935, Fla. Stat. (2008). As we held in State v. Scriber, 991 So.2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008), “[section 316.1935(6) clearly prohibits a withhold of adjudication for a section 316.1935 violation.” Id. at 970. We further held that section 316.1935 prevailed over the downward departure statute, section 921.0026, Florida Statutes, for two reasons. First, “[b]ecause [section 316.1935] is the later promulgated statute, section 316.1935(6) should prevail as the last expression of legislative intent on the subject of sentencing for an aggravated fleeing and eluding charge.” Id. (internal quotations and citation omitted). Second, because “section 316.1935(6) specifically addresses sentencing under section 316.1935 ... [t]he more specific statute is *101considered to be an exception to the general terms of the more comprehensive statute [section 921.0026].” Id. (internal quotations and citation omitted).
Thus, the circuit court erred by withholding adjudication under the premise that such a sentence was a permissible downward departure. The court similarly erred in failing to revoke the defendant’s driver’s license for a period not less than one year nor exceeding five years. Consequently, we reverse and remand to the circuit court. Because the transcript makes clear that the circuit court advised the defendant that it would impose a downward departure sentence if the defendant entered a plea, the court on remand must permit the defendant to withdraw his plea. State v. Gosier, 737 So.2d 1121, 1123-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).
Reversed and remanded.
MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Culver, 63 So. 3d 891 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…eluding a law enforcement officer in violation of section 316.1935(1), Florida Statutes (2009). Section' 316.1935(6) expressly prohibits the court from "withholding adjudication of guilt for any violation of section 316.1935. See State v. Warner, 50 So. 3d 99 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); State v. Scriber, 991 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (holding trial court not permitted by statute to withhold adjudication of guilt in light of fleeing and eluding statutes express prohibition). For this reason, we reverse that…
-
State v. Joronjaye Leprino Teague, 275 So. 3d 828 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)
-
State v. Rapson (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Scriber, 991 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
- State v. Pequita L. Gosier, 737 So. 2d 1121 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)