DONALD PERRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2010-12-28
No. 1D10-1642
BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.
50 So. 3d 762 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The First District Court of Appeal imposed sanctions on Donald Perry, a pro se litigant, prohibiting him from filing appeals without attorney representation due to his history of 37 frivolous filings that have substantially interfered with the court's administration of justice.


Holding

Sanctions are imposed requiring Perry to secure a Florida Bar member's appearance in any pending active case within 10 days or face dismissal, and the court clerk is directed to refuse acceptance of any further pro se filings from Perry.


Headnotes

[1] A court may impose sanctions, including a prohibition against appearing pro se, against a litigant who repeatedly files frivolous appeals.

[2] A litigant's history of filing numerous frivolous pro se appeals that interfere with the administration of justice can warrant sanctions.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Perry's repetitious and frivolous filings have substantially interfered with the administration of justice and have adversely affected the ability of this Court to devote its finite resources to consideration of genuine disputes and col-orable claims by those who have not abused the system.”

The court's rationale for imposing sanctions, emphasizing the institutional harm caused by frivolous filings.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Perry filed an appeal challenging the denial of postconviction motions related to his 1977 first-degree murder conviction. The trial court summarily d…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Donald Perry (DC # 50031), sought review of an order summarily denying multiple postconviction motions relating to his 1977 first-degree murder conviction. We affirmed the trial court’s order without opinion on July 29, 2010, and we also issued an order directing Perry to “show cause ... why sanctions, possibly including a prohibition against appearing in this Court unless represented by counsel, should not be imposed against him” based upon his history of filing frivolous pro se appeals in this Court.

The response to the order filed by Perry failed to show good cause why sanctions should not be imposed against him. The records of this Court reflect 37 cases in which Perry has appeared pro se as the appellant or petitioner, including 17 cases since 2005 and at least 12 prior appeals involving the denial of postconviction motions related to his 1977 conviction. None of the prior appeals resulted in the granting of any relief to Perry, and like the prior cases, the present appeal was wholly frivolous.

We find that Perry’s repetitious and frivolous filings have substantially interfered with the administration of justice and have adversely affected the ability of this Court to devote its finite resources to consideration of genuine disputes and col-orable claims by those who have not abused the system. See Pettway v. McNeil, 987 So.2d 20 (Fla.2008); Franklin v. State, 25 So.3d 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that Perry shall secure the filing of a notice of appearance by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar in any active case now pending before this court in which he appears as appellant or petitioner within 10 days of the date of this order, failing which such cases shall be dismissed. Further, the Clerk of this Court is directed to accept no further pro se filings from Perry; if received, such documents shall be returned to Perry without filing and with a reference to this order. The Clerk shall also forward a certified copy of this order to the Department of Corrections pursuant to section 944.279, Florida Statutes.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BENTON, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw