HORACE MANN INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
ALLISON N. CHASE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD CHASE, DECEASED., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed sanctions imposed on insurance company for discovery misconduct because the trial court failed to comply with procedural requirements for imposing sanctions under Rule 1.380 or its inherent power.
Sanctions for discovery misconduct are improper when the trial court fails to satisfy the procedural requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380 or the requirements established in Moakley v. Smallwood for exercising inherent sanctioning power.
[1] Sanctions for discovery misconduct under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380 require that the moving party prevail on a motion to compel or that opposing counsel fail t…
[2] When imposing sanctions pursuant to a court's inherent power, the written order must satisfy the procedural requirements established in Moakley v. …
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHorace Mann Insurance Company was sanctioned by the trial court for gross discovery misconduct and bad faith failure to participate in pre-trial disco…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Rule Of Civil Procedure 1.380 cases and more on FLexlaw
We grant the Appellee’s Motion for Clarification, withdraw our previous opinion, and substitute the following opinion in its place.
This appeal concerns a circuit court’s decision to impose sanctions for a party’s bad-faith failure to participate in pre-trial discovery. Because the order imposing sanctions does not meet the requirements of either rule or common law, we reverse the order as it applies to Appellant, Horace Mann Insurance Co.
Prior to trial, the circuit court concluded Appellant committed “gross discovery misconduct” and acted with “bad faith, willfulness or deliberate disregard.” The court imposed sanctions against Appellant pursuant to (1) Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380 (2008); and (2) its inherent power to sanction.
Sanctions were inappropriate under Rule 1.380 because the Appellees did not prevail on a motion to compel and Appellant’s counsel did not fail to appear at a duly noticed deposition. See Fla. R. Civ. P. Rule 1.380 (2008). Sanctions were also inappropriate under the court’s inherent power to sanction because, although the record amply supported the trial judge’s conclusion, the court’s written order failed to satisfy requirements set forth in Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221, 223-27 (Fla.2002). We note that sanctions may have been available under section 57.105(3), Florida Statutes (2008), but the Appellees did not timely request such relief.
Accordingly, because the circuit court’s order failed to cite sufficient grounds on which to base its imposition of sanctions against Appellant, we reverse.
REVERSED.
WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rush v. Burdge, 141 So. 3d 764 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
Authorities Cited
- Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 2002)