J. STUART BAKER, AN INDIVIDUAL, APPELLANT,
v.
HOWARD I. STORFER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A creditor sought to garnish a debtor's wages to satisfy a judgment, but the debtor's employer objected on the ground that the debtor was paid by commission rather than salary or wages. The court held that commissions constitute "wages" under Florida's garnishment statute and are therefore subject to garnishment.
The court held that commissions are "wages" within the meaning of section 77.0305 and are therefore subject to garnishment. The court reversed the trial court's order denying the garnishment.
[1] Commissions are considered "wages" for purposes of Florida's continuing writ of garnishment statute.
[2] The term "wages" in statutes should be construed in its plain and ordinary sense, encompassing all types of payments made for labor or services.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“"Wages" is a broad term that encompasses all types of payments made for labor or services. In Black's Law Dictionary, "wage" is defined as "[p]ayment for labor or services, usu. based on time worked or quantity produced; specif., compensation of an employee based on time worked or output of production. Wages include every form of remuneration ... including ... commissions."”
Establishes the broad definition of wages and explicitly includes commissions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJ. Stuart Baker obtained a personal judgment against Howard I. Storfer. Baker sought to collect the judgment by garnishing Storfer's wages through his…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Definition Of 'Wages' cases and more on FLexlaw
This appeal stems from an unpaid personal judgment obtained by J. Stuart Baker (“Creditor”) against Howard I. Storfer (“Debtor”). Creditor sought to collect the judgment by garnishing Debtor’s wages. Creditor filed a motion for a continuing writ of garnishment, pursuant to section 77.0305, Florida Statutes (2009). Garnishee, Debtor’s employer, objected to the writ, contending that Debtor was paid by commissions and that commissions were not “salary or wages” as envisioned by section 77.0305. The trial court agreed, reasoning that Debtor, as a commissioned employee, did not have income that was *653subject to garnishment. We disagree and reverse.
Whether commissions are considered “salary or wages” under section 77.0305 is a question of statutory interpretation that is reviewed de novo. See Arnold, Matheny & Eagan, P.A. v. First Am. Holdings, Inc., 982 So.2d 628, 632 (Fla.2008). Section 77.0305 provides that:
Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, if salary or wages are to be garnished to satisfy a judgment, the court shall issue a continuing writ of garnishment to the judgment debtor’s employer which provides for the periodic payment of a portion of the salary or wages of the judgment debtor as the salary or wages become due until the judgment is satisfied or until otherwise provided by court order.
The terms “salary” and “wage” have not been specifically defined within the garnishment statutes. However, “ ‘[w]ords of common usage, when employed in a statute, should be construed in their plain and ordinary sense.’ ” Brock v. Westport Recovery Corp., 832 So.2d 209, 213 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (quoting Zuckerman v. Alter, 615 So.2d 661, 663 (Fla.1993)).
“Wages” is a broad term that encompasses all types of payments made for labor or services. In Black’s Law Dictionary, “wage” is defined as “[p]ayment for labor or services, usu. based on time worked or quantity produced; specif., compensation of an employee based on time worked or output of production. Wages include every form of remuneration ... including ... commissions.” BlacK’s Law Dictionary 1610 (8th ed. 2004). Debtor cites Brock and Cadle Co. v. G & G Associates, 737 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), for the proposition that commissions are not “salary or wages.” A review of those cases shows that “commissions” were simply not at issue. Brock dealt with “discretionary distributions from a family-owned business” while Cadle Co. addressed “draws, expense reimbursement, and capital account disbursements.” Brock, 832 So.2d at 212; Cadle Co., 737 So.2d at 1140.
Courts have held, in other contexts, that the term “wages” includes commissions. For example, in the unemployment compensation context, “wages” include “all remuneration for employment, including commissions, bonuses, back pay awards, and the cash value of all remuneration paid in any medium other than cash.” § 443.1217(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). Similarly, in awarding attorney’s fees in actions for “unpaid wages,” the term “unpaid wages” includes unpaid commissions. § 448.08, Fla. Stat. (2009); Gulf Solar, Inc. v. Westfall, 447 So.2d 363, 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (holding that commissions are wages within the meaning of section 448.08); Langford v. Paravant, Inc., 48 So.3d 75, 76 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (same). We find the above holdings persuasive in this case. As such, we hold that commissions are “wages,” for purposes of section 77.0305 of the garnishment statutes, and reverse the trial court’s order.
Reversed and remanded.
GROSS, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Charles J. Kane, Harley N. Kane, & Kane & Kane, P.A. v. Stewart Tilghman FOX & Bianchi, P.A., 197 So. 3d 137 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)…hat the second writ was allowed by law. B. Status of Monies held by the Firm for the Appellants The classification of monies sought in a garnishment proceeding “is a question of statutory interpretation that is reviewed de novo.” Baker v. Storfer, 51 So. 3d 652, 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). The party seeking an exemption from garnishment has the burden of proving, entitlement to the exemption. Cadle Co. v. G & G Assocs., 757 So. 2d 1278, 1279 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Under section 222.11(2), “disposable earnings…
-
Abramov v. NextGear Cap., Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)…e classification of monies sought in a garnishment proceeding ‘is a question of statutory interpretation that is reviewed de novo.’” Kane v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A., 197 So. 3d 137, 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (quoting Baker v. Storfer, 51 So. 3d 652, 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). On appeal, Abramov argues section 77.041(1), Florida Statutes, does not require him to formally state “the funds were protected by tenancy by the entireties” on the exemption form. He contends that checking category t…
-
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Adams (Fla. 1st DCA 2020)…“The classification of monies sought in a garnishment proceeding ‘is a question of statutory interpretation that is reviewed de novo.’” Kane v. Stewart Tilghman Fox & Bianchi, P.A., 197 So. 3d 137, 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (quoting Baker v. Storfer, 51 So. 3d 652, 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)); see also Hart v. Wachovia Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, 159 So. 3d 244, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). “Every person or entity who has sued to recover a debt or has recovered judgment in any court against any person or entity has a right…
Authorities Cited
- Zuckerman v. Alter, 615 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 1993)
- Gulf Solar, Inc. v. Westfall, 447 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
- Arnold, Matheny & Eagan, P.A. v. First Am. Holdings, Inc., 982 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2008)
- Brock v. Westport Recovery Corp., 832 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
- The Cadle Co. v. G & G Assocs., 737 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- Langford v. Paravant, Inc., 48 So. 3d 75 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)