KATHERINE PREW-LUDDEN AND RICHARD LUDDEN, D/B/A PREW-LUDDEN REAL ESTATE BROKERS, APPELLANTS.
v.
WALTER H. JORDAN, SR., AND MARY IRMA JORDAN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reviewed a trial court's directed verdict for the defendants (Fowlers) in a real estate broker's (Hartnett) suit for commission, determining if the plaintiff presented a prima facie case.
The appellate court reversed the directed verdict, finding that the plaintiff broker had presented a prima facie case sufficient to withstand the motion for a directed verdict.
A real estate broker sued a couple for a commission, alleging he produced a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase their property on agreed terms.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
The appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause and the Court having heard argument of counsel thereon, it is upon consideration thereof
Ordered that the said motion to dismiss be and the same is hereby granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Section 59.09, Florida Statutes 1957, F.S.A.; Rule 3.2, subd. f, Florida Appellate Rules.