ROBERT ACOSTA, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ROBERT ACOSTA, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
51 So. 3d 1259
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the judgment and sentence in case number CF08-18275, in the Circuit Court in and for Orange County, Florida. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c)(5)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
MONACO, C.J., SAWAYA and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Winder v. Dian A. Winder, 152 So. 3d 836 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)…intentional misconduct based on evidence showing that the marital funds were used for one party’s ‘own benefit and for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown.’ ” Belford v. Belford, 51 So. 3d 1259, 1260-61 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (quoting Roth v. Roth, 973 So. 2d 580, 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)). “Misconduct is not shown by ‘mismanagement or simple squandering of marital assets in a manner of which the other spouse disapproves.’"” Id. (quoting Roth, 9…
-
Walker v. Walker, 85 So. 3d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)…intentional misconduct based on evidence showing that the marital funds were used for one party’s ‘own benefit and for a purpose unrelated to the marriage at a time when the marriage is undergoing an irreconcilable breakdown.’ ” Belford v. Belford, 51 So. 3d 1259, 1260-61 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (quoting Roth v. Roth, 973 So. 2d 580, 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)). “Misconduct is not shown by ‘mismanagement or simple squandering of marital assets in a manner of which the other spouse disapproves.’ ” Id. (quoting Roth, 9…
-
David v. David, 58 So. 3d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)…ilities equally or to make findings of fact justifying an unequal distribution. Our courts have approved unequal distribution when the evidence establishes misconduct, such as intentional waste or depletion of marital assets. See Belford v. Belford, 51 So. 3d 1259 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Santiago v. Santiago, 51 So. 3d 637 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Jonsson v. Jonsson, 715 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). However, disparate earning abilities cannot, without more, justify unequal distribution of marital assets and liabil…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence