BERT NASTER, APPELLANT,
v.
UNIVERSAL DIE CASTING CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
BERT NASTER, APPELLANT,
UNIVERSAL DIE CASTING CORP., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
101 So. 2d 596
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause came on to he heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the decree appealed from, and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the decree appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted and the decree is
Affirmed.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Easley v. THE Garden Sanctuary, Inc., 120 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)…certiorari he requested. Since the Tantillo case, supra, the appellate procedure has been changed by the adoption of the new Article V of the Constitution which created the District Courts of Appeal. In the case of Rosenblum v. Boss, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 596, the Third District Court of Appeal held that Section 33.11, Fla.Stat. no longer can serve to confer jurisdiction upon circuit courts over appeals from civil courts of record, and that under the present constitutional provision Districts Courts of A…
-
Placid York Co., Inc. v. Calvert Hotel Co., Inc., 109 So. 2d 604 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)…. We therefore find that the appeal was not timely and it must be and hereby is dismissed. See Wiesen v. Schatzberg, supra. CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON, J., concur. . See Art. 5, § 5(3) Fla.Const., 26 F.S.A., Rosenblum v. Boss, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 596. . Chapter 4434, Laws of Fla. (1895). . Chapter 11357, Laws of Fla. (1925), F.S.A. § 33.01 et seq. . Chapter 11970, Laws of Fla. (1927). . Chapter 21868, Laws of Florida (1943), F.S.A. § 33.14.…
-
In re Est. of George H. Wartman v. Wartman, 118 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960)…of the Order appealed from and in the cause at bar the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty (30) days from and after the Order appealed from.” We find the ground is well taken and the appeal is dismissed. In Rosenblum v. Boss, Fla.App.1958, 101 So. 2d 596, we held on authority of Codomo v. Shaw, Fla.1958, 99 So. 2d 849, that the constitutional authority and support for § 33.11, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., (which provided for appeals from the civil court of record to the circuit court) had been withdrawn by §…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence