THE ESTATE OF POWER ED MEUS, BY AND THROUGH POWER MEUS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE GEO GROUP, INC., F/K/A WACKENHUT CORRECTIONS CORP., D/B/A MOORE HAVEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, THE STATE OF FLORIDA, THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 2011-02-09
No. 4D10-2137
WARNER, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
52 So. 3d 845 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, The Geo Group, Inc., concedes that the trial court erred in failing to make the necessary findings of fact required by Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1993), and Cook v. Custom Marine Distributing, Inc., 29 So.3d 462 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), when dismissing appellant’s lawsuit as a sanction for failure to comply with the trial court’s discovery orders and when denying appellant’s motion for relief from judgment. Accordingly, we reverse the orders and remand this case for the trial court to enter an order based on the findings required by Kozel and Cook, consider imposing a lesser sanction, or take any other action it deems appropriate consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and Remanded.

WARNER, TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …rmination of the amount of rent due. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.230 (stating that “intervention shall be in subordination to, and in recognition of, the propriety of the main proceeding”). In the recent case of First States Investors 3300, LLC v. Pheil, 52 So. 3d 845 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), a lessee deposited rent in the registry of the court, while it sought a declaratory judgment claiming that the rental escalation clauses in the lease were ambiguous, and it was in doubt as to the amount of rent it owed. The trial…
  • Tixe Designs, Inc. v. Green ICE, Inc., 207 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
    …ed this non-final appeal. ANALYSIS “A trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to permit a deposit into the court registry as well as deciding whether to grant a withdrawal from the registry.” First States Investors 3300, LLC v. Pheil, 52 So. 3d 845, 848 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (citing Pomponio v. Claridge of Pompano Condo., Inc., 378 So. 2d 774, 780 n. 39 (Fla.1979)). However, we review the interpretation of a rule of court de novo. First States Investors 3300, 52 So. 3d at 848. This case involves…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw