DEONSEY LONTE JOHNSON, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• In the Interest of K.B.L.V., 176 So. 3d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …y. We disagree that K.B.L.V. is a dependent child found to have been abandoned, abused, or neglected. A de novo standard governs this Court’s review of the trial court’s application of the correct law. See C.R. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 53 So. 3d 240, 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); G.C. & D.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 791 So. 2d 17, 19 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). The purpose of chapter 39, Florida Statutes (2013), is: To provide for the care, safety, and protection of children in an environment…
• In the Interest of: B.Y.G.M., 176 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …tained the age of majority, and the department is no longer required to supervise her placement. [*293] A de novo standard governs this Court’s review of the trial court’s denial of B.Y.G.M.’s petition. See C.R. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 53 So. 3d 240, 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); G.C. & D.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 791 So. 2d 17, 19 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). We agree with the trial court’s determination that there is no support for an adjudication of dependency. The, father’s abandonment wa…
• D.R. v. J.R., 203 So. 3d 952 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)
  …t reversibly erred by placing the children with the father without complying with the provisions of the ICPC. We agree.3 “The standard of review for a question of law in dependency proceedings is de novo.” C.R. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 53 So. 3d 240, 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (quoting G.C. & D.C. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 791 So. 2d 17, 19 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)). In relevant part, the ICPC provides: 409.401 Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children. Article III Conditions for Placeme…