STEPHEN M. SCHWARTZ, R.PH, APPELLANT,
v.
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2011-02-02
No. 1D10-2684
DAVIS, HAWKES and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
53 So. 3d 1140 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2011)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

See Toth v. S. Fla. Water Mgmt. Dist., 895 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (“In order to obtain review of the action of an administrative agency, a person’s ‘substantial interests’ must have been determined”); Sickon v. School Bd. of Alachua County, 719 So.2d 360, 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (“The allegations of the petition must be examined to determine whether the facts alleged amount to an injury ‘under the protection of pertinent substantive law”).

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, HAWKES and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw