DAVID SAINTIL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2011-02-02
No. 3D10-1519
Before GERSTEN, SHEPHERD, and LAGOA, JJ.
53 So. 3d 1146 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2011) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 948.11, Fla. Stat. (2009); Freeman v. State, Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 436 So.2d 964 (Fla. 3d DCA1983).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Vinzett Watkins v. State, 134 So. 3d 536 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
    …PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, the State concedes that Appellant Vinzett Watkins does not appear to have been credited with fifteen days for time served in a juvenile detention center prior to sentencing. See, e.g., Jones v. State, 53 So. 3d 1146, 1147 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (“Time spent in such detention is credited like time spent in county jail.”). As such, we reverse the order denying Watkins’ motion for additional jail credit and remand with directions that the trial court either credit Wat…
  • Sheppard v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2025)

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw