JOHN TYRONE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN TYRONE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
54 So. 3d 612
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2011)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
AFFIRMED. We affirm Williams’ conviction and sentence, but remand for correction of a scrivener’s error in the written judgment, which mistakenly reflects a conviction for carjacking with a firearm rather than simple carjacking.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for Correction of Scrivener’s Error.
GRIFFIN, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Millard Mall Servs., Inc. v. Bolda, 155 So. 3d 1272 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…upport of requiring production of [work-product] was nothing more than unsworn argument of counsel or a bare assertion of need and undue hardship which is insufficient to satisfy the required showing”); Universal City Dev. Partners, Ltd. v. Pupillo, 54 So. 3d 612, 614 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (finding petitioner’s argument that information about prior incidents was within the scope of discovery, that such information was known to defendant but not to him, and that he was unable to obtain substantial equivalent ma…
-
Magical Cruise Co. Ltd. v. Turk, 114 So. 3d 233 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013)…rt ordered DCL to produce all 17 photographs. DCL seeks certiorari relief from this discovery order. The work product doctrine promotes the adversary system by protecting an attorney’s trial preparation. See Universal City Dev. Partners v. Pupillo, 54 So. 3d 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). However, it is not an absolute privilege. Under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(3) (Apr.2012), a party may obtain discovery of documents and tangible objects prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for…