BARBREE CRONEY, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that it will no longer accept pro se filings from Barbree Croney due to his history of initiating frivolous proceedings.
Barbree Croney has a long history of initiating meritless proceedings in the court. He has initiated at least sixteen proceedings since his 1985 convi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Pro Se Filings cases and more on FLexlaw
ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Barbree Croney has repeatedly initiated frivolous proceedings in this court. Today, after having provided an opportunity to respond, we impose the sanction of no longer accepting Croney’s pro se filings.
Croney has a long history of initiating meritless proceedings. Originally convicted and sentenced on two counts of sexual battery on a child in 1985, Croney has since initiated at least sixteen proceedings in this court. See Croney v. State, 495 So.2d 926, 927 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). In his reply to this court’s order to show cause, Croney attested that he would no longer file any pro se documents concerning the matter in the instant case.
Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and henceforth refuse to accept any more of Croney’s pro se filings. See Perry v. Mascara, 959 So.2d 771, 773 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (citing State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999)). The clerk of this court is directed to no longer accept any of Croney’s filings unless the document is signed by an attorney licensed to practice law in Florida who certifies that the document is filed in good faith.
STEVENSON, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (20 total)
-
Haygood v. State, 109 So. 3d 735 (Fla. 2013)…[*737] LABARGA, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Haygood v. State, 54 So. 3d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), in which the Second District certified a question to this Court to be of great public importance. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We rephrase the certified question as follows: IF A JURY RETURNS A VERDIC…1 / 3
-
Daugherty v. State, 96 So. 3d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…ed. Affirmed in part; Reversed in part. MAY, C.J. and CONNER, J., concur. . Accordingly, our resolution of this issue will not be affected by the Florida Supreme Court's ultimate determination regarding the certified question in Haygood v. State, 54 So. 3d 1035 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 61 So. 3d 410 (Fla.2011). . The co-defendant, who was also convicted of second degree murder, was sentenced to thirty years in prison. . Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) (holdin…
-
Curry v. State, 64 So. 3d 152 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…aw. Since the supreme court’s decision in Montgomery, this court has held that the manslaughter by act instruction was not fundamentally erroneous when the jury was also instructed on the culpable negligence theory of manslaughter. Haygood v. State, 54 So. 3d 1035, 1038 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (certifying a question regarding whether the error in the manslaughter by act instruction is fundamental when the jury was also instructed on manslaughter by culpable negligence but the evidence did not support that theory);…
Previewing 3 of 20 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)
- Perry v. Mascara, 959 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
- Barbree Croney v. State, 495 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)