STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH GARNER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The State appealed after a trial court granted a defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal following conviction of a lesser-included offense (resisting arrest without violence). The court held that by requesting a lesser-included offense instruction, the defendant waived the right to challenge sufficiency of the evidence for that lesser offense, and the trial court erred in granting the post-verdict acquittal motion.
A defendant who requests an instruction on a lesser-included offense waives the right to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence as to the lesser offense. The trial court erred in granting the judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of evidence for the lesser offense and should have reviewed sufficiency as to the charged greater offense.
[1] A defendant who requests an instruction on a lesser-included offense waives any subsequent argument regarding the sufficiency of the evidence to support that lesser-inclu…
[2] When a defendant is charged with a greater offense and found guilty of a lesser-included offense after requesting an instruction on the lesser offense, the court must rev…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“By requesting the instruction on the lesser-included offense, the defendant waives any argument as to the sufficiency of the evidence as to the lesser offense.”
Establishes the core legal principle that requesting a lesser-included offense instruction constitutes a waiver of sufficiency challenges to that lesser offense.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJoseph Garner was charged with resisting arrest with violence. The jury found him guilty of the lesser-included offense of resisting arrest without vi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Lesser Included Offense cases and more on FLexlaw
Joseph Garner was charged with resisting arrest with violence, but the jury found him guilty of the lesser-included offense of resisting arrest without violence. The trial court granted Garner’s motion for judgment of acquittal after the verdict based on the insufficiency of the evidence *1047to support the lesser-included offense. The State appeals from that order, arguing that Garner waived any postverdict sufficiency of the evidence argument by requesting the permissive lesser-included offense instruction. We agree and reverse.
When, as here, a defendant seeks an instruction on a lesser-included offense and is found guilty of the lesser offense, the court must review the evidence to determine if it is sufficient to support the greater offense, not the lesser. State v. Espinosa, 686 So.2d 1345, 1348-49 (Fla.1996); Messer v. State, 757 So.2d 526, 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). By requesting the instruction on the lesser-included offense, the defendant waives any argument as to the sufficiency of the evidence as to the lesser offense. Espinosa, 686 So.2d at 1349 (holding that the act of requesting an instruction on the lesser-included offense or affirmatively relying on the instruction waives the right to challenge the State’s proof on the elements of the lesser offense “in exchange for the possibility of allowing the jury to exercise its pardon power”).
Because the trial court erred in granting the postverdict judgment of acquittal based on the sufficiency of the evidence for the lesser-included offense rather than the charged offense, we reverse and remand for the trial court to reinstate the conviction for resisting arrest without violence.
Reversed and remanded.
WALLACE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Espinosa, 686 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 1996)
- Messer v. State, 757 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)